COMMISSIONERS
FAVOR 2011 REVALUATION
Mitchem,
Klein vote against move

Lincoln
County Commissioner Carrol Mitchem was
one of two commissioners Monday night to
vote against moving the county's next
revaluation from 2011 to 2010.
By
Jon Mayhew (LINCOLNTON)
-- Grab your wallets and pray.
Monday
night at the county commission meeting,
commissioners voted 3-2 in favor of
moving the next Lincoln County
revaluation ahead one year, meaning
instead of 2012, the next property
revaluation is scheduled for 2011.
Commissioners
also decided to keep the revaluation
process in-house, meaning no outsourcing
of the revaluation process.
Commissioners
Carrol Mitchem and James Klein voted
against the move. Commissioners Alex
Patton, George Arena and Bruce Carlton
voted in favor of the move.
Despite
the "yea" vote, Bruce Carlton
commented that as the result of the last
valuation -- which in some cases more
than doubled property values in Denver --
he knows "people personally that are
losing their house because they cannot
afford the property."
He also
said that he wants to bring "some
relief" to the taxpayers of Lincoln
County.
"I
don't buy it that people have a tough
road to hoe," said Carlton. "At
this point and time, we aren't giving
people real value on property. It's not
the tax department's fault. It's the
economy."
Before
voting no, Commissioner Mitchem said the
tax appeal process in Lincoln County is
not taxpayer friendly. Out of more than
46,000 parcels in the county, about 6
percent -- or 3,500 landowners --
appealed their revaluations. Of that
number, about 5.7 percent went to
Raleigh.
"We
don't have a good appeal process here in
Lincoln County," said Mitchem.
"The reason why Raleigh isn't
hearing more from Lincoln County is
because by the time (landowners) get to
that step, they're so beat down."
Michael
Brown with the state department of
revenue disagreed with Mitchem, calling
Mitchem's comment "loaded."
"Nobody
wants to pay taxes," said Brown.
"As part of the appeals process,
public relations plays a big part of the
process."
Brown
said that in looking at a piece of
property, the state looks for three
different sources of revenue including
cost and income a piece of property could
generate.
Mitchem
didn't like the rationale.
"You're
telling me that if I own a mobile home
and rent that mobile home out, then I'm
not only paying taxes on the income but
on the property as well," said
Mitchem.
The
original issue brought before
commissioners was whether or not to
outsource the revaluation process in
Lincoln County.
Tax
administrator Madge Huffman told
commissioners it would cost more to
outsource revaluations than keep them in
house, a practice that's been done since
1993.
Huffman
said at the time of that revaluation,
people were so upset with their property
valuations that people took their
protests to the streets.
"There
were people driving around in pickup
trucks with signs on them," said
Huffman, "in the Courtsquare."
Huffman
said the cost for the current in house
reval process is around $1.456 million.
Outsourcing, the cost goes to more than
$2 million.
"Also,
it opens up the possibility for a lot of
incorrect information and other
mistakes," said Huffman.
At
first, Huffman maintained that shortening
the cycle to three years would reduce
costs. However, after questioning by
commissioners, Huffman admitted the cost
would remain the same, that the county
would by paying the cost one year
earlier.
Commissioner
Mitchem said he remembers the 1993
revaluation very well.
"The
most thing I heard from citizens back
then was how can people who live in
Arkansas and Ohio can come in here and
revaluate our property," said
Mitchem.
|